Search for: "People v. McCord"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
McCord is executive director and Annie L. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:47 am
Justice Antonin Scalia [wrote for the majority in] District of Columbia v. [read post]
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Mary McCord is one of the counsel representing former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services Maria Vullo in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
People v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:41 am
McCord, 19 Wn. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He refers to Canadian authorities in support of this. 15.01 Ronan Lavery QC now on representing Raymond McCord. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Pathologizing people’s justifiable anger at having no meaningful access to court is not useful. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 6:24 am
Carl Folsom won in State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
-Marbury v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 5:46 am
Mary McCord outlined five reasons to worry about 3D-printed plastic guns. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:37 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:49 am
They're using the (as yet unnamed, but they're looking at something cute and "catchy" like "U-V-A" [I was thinking maybe "We're Watching," but what do I know]) spy blimp.Keith McCord in the Deseret News describes the thing (pictured above, photo from hyperblimp.com which you should go to just to watch the video on the home page).The blimp will be filled with helium. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:04 pm
In People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 8:31 am
To sum up: When people say that we lack a federal criminal law for domestic terrorism scenarios, this is only partially accurate. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
