Search for: "People v. McCoy" Results 61 - 80 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2015, 5:09 am by SHG
Much as this may make advocates sad, Lave’s premise, based on Chancellor Carol McCoy’s decision in Mock v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
McCoy because of his sexual preference and this endeared Whitaker to the evangelical Christians who revel in the anti-gay movement. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
McCoy, No. 06-4850 "Grant of a motion to suppress evidence seized after the detention and search of the defendant in a grocery store parking lot is reversed and remanded where the searching officer possessed a reasonable, articulable suspicion that defendant was engaged in serious criminality when the officer stopped and frisked him. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The Q is not how to fix a broken whackamole system but how do platforms discharge their duties based on the risk they introduce, not one size fits all [just two sizes, I guess].Stan Adams Center for Democracy & Technology: Directive provisions are fundamentally problematic and unbalanced v. 512. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 2:00 am by Guest Author
Indeed, one of the Supreme Court’s important cases upholding a congressional delegation of power to the Executive was Field v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]