Search for: "People v. McKenna" Results 1 - 20 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The problem is that if it wasn’t orange people wouldn’t buy it. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 1:21 pm
***In passing, note there was a famous IP case involving portable toilets: Carson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 10:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The panel held that the district court did not err by declining to make findings regarding the Treaty’s meaning to the Yakama people at the time of its signing because the meaning to the Yakama people could not overcome the clear words of the Treaty. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 McKenna: sometimes it’s just a state of uncertainty (difficulty in understanding) v. false actual belief. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:42 am by 1 Crown Office Row
R (on the application of Ingenious Media Holdings plc and Patrick McKenna v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2013] EWHC 3258 (Admin) –  read judgment  Sales J has rejected an application for judicial review by Ingenious Media Holdings plc and Patrick McKenna, who complained that senior officials in HMRC had identified them in “off the record” briefings. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:16 pm by Record on Appeal
On May 31, 2013, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued its opinion (authored by Justice McKenna) in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
McKenna: normatively: how much are we shaping TM law for the committed v. uncommitted consumers? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
McKenna: people will have an affirmative incentive to file things they wouldn’t have filed before. [read post]