Search for: "People v. McKenna" Results 1 - 20 of 211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2021, 3:29 pm by James Campbell
Capitol Police sergeant, it appears his name is Sergeant McKenna. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Felix Wu: If some people are confused, then you’re mixing up people who are confused and people who experience what the law calls dilution. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Mark McKenna: Another explanation was maybe these bespoke regimes weren’t addressing actual problems; overrepresentation of people w/specific litigation interests. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” and also people worried about liability so they may not opt out. [read post]
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Protection v. enforcement: even if protected as a TM, the scope may be limited. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Mark McKenna: really stuck on the label “endorsement” for a dead person. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Estimable v. irreparable seems like another axis worth thinking about, as does discrete v. ongoing behavior. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sarah Burstein: Reichman is worried that designs can’t satisfy nonobviousness—but the Federal Circuit has removed constraints.Reichman: the Fed Cir has improved it; but still, nonobviousness means that people don’t apply—the lawyers tell the designer there’s no chance. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They raise the price, eliminate competition, cut people out, transfer consumer surplus to themselves—but they are also giving something to people who canafford the chair: a chair with more narrative and thus more market value. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
I have just now gotten around to my notes from this excellent roundtable.Introduction: Mark McKenna & Graeme DinwoodieWhy do a roundtable like this? [read post]