Search for: "People v. McKenna" Results 181 - 200 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lemley, Stanford Law School: co-authored paper with Mark McKenna. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
"The first clause has prompted some to wonder whether Madison knew of Donaldson v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
CMS Cameron McKenna’s Rob Briggs discusses recent developments here. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
"This was the best continuing legal education I've had in 17 years," attorney Don McKenna told me. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
To take an example from Mark McKenna, suppose the NYT runs a story truthfully saying "Nike Announces New Shoe Line," and because Nike is so good at marketing consumers assume that Nike authorized that headline. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
Phillip Carter is an associate in McKenna Long & Aldridge's Los Angeles Office, where he is a member of the Government Contracts practice group. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
Some people suggest that dilution protection reduces consumer search costs. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
It would be a user right.Originality v. novelty - copyright and patent. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
(I think this claim makes Mark McKenna’s point quite well: TM’s key wrong turn came when it abandoned competition. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 10:41 pm
The October 2007 issue of the Oxford University Press monthly Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice leads with an editorial, "Killing the orphans", on the curious position of orphan works within the scheme of copyright law and elsewhere.Right: Killing helpless orphans is a theme that stirs the merciful instincts of many people - but not when it comes to copyright protection.Other features in this issue include* "The interplay between IP rights and… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:08 am by Rob Robinson
(Part One) – (eDiscovery Team) A Timely Warning to Employees About Social Media – (Amanda Bronstad) Baglow v Smith – The Increasing Importance of Context in Defamation Claims - (Bob Tarantino) Connecticut Courts Weigh In on Social Media as Evidence – (Marie Grady) D.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Rob Robinson
Grow - (Cas Purdy) Deloitte Global Corporate Counsel Report 2011 - (Registration Required) (Deloitte) eDiscovery Basics: Litigation Preparedness (Vol. 1, No. 3) (Gibson Dunn) June Edition of Corporate Counsel Magazine - Online - (ALM) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 1 - (Kayleigh Roberts, Ashley Trent) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 2 -… [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Mutilation v. destruction: people do debate which is worse. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Glynn Lunney: He heard an argument for reduced damages for unauthorized users who create value, but that doesn’t implicate blocking copyrights as in Gracen v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
On June 27, Rose Porter picked up a whole hog from Stewart’s Meats in McKenna, Washington. [read post]