Search for: "People v. McKenna" Results 181 - 200 of 206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
McKenna: it’s a statement about people who buy Louis Vuitton. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mark McKenna: The issue is people who conclude that making you think harder in any way is a search cost. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm by Colin O'Keefe
As mentioned earlier in the week, Facebook has changed their privacy settings; once again, the social network has people concerned. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
(I think this claim makes Mark McKenna’s point quite well: TM’s key wrong turn came when it abandoned competition. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:57 am
What about the people who make up that profession? [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
I even got comments from people that thought I was "absurd" for not listing them. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:26 am
Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm by jesse londin
First, SLP joins folks around the globe including everybody here in blogspace in congratulating CNSA and the people of China on the success of the lunar probe Chang'e I. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
" [emphasis added by LawPundit]In supporting Justice McKenna and in not supporting Justice Harlan, Epstein is as wrong as those who supported Justice Henry Billings Brown (who never earned a law degree) in Plessy v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 10:41 pm
The October 2007 issue of the Oxford University Press monthly Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice leads with an editorial, "Killing the orphans", on the curious position of orphan works within the scheme of copyright law and elsewhere.Right: Killing helpless orphans is a theme that stirs the merciful instincts of many people - but not when it comes to copyright protection.Other features in this issue include* "The interplay between IP rights and… [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
Some people suggest that dilution protection reduces consumer search costs. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:47 pm
Those principles having failed, we return to competition; likewise, people like Mark McKenna are starting to suggest a materiality requirement for infringement. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
To take an example from Mark McKenna, suppose the NYT runs a story truthfully saying "Nike Announces New Shoe Line," and because Nike is so good at marketing consumers assume that Nike authorized that headline. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
From the defense side, Michael Krauss opines on the subject at Point of Law;Mark McKenna has the story of a $15M verdict from a defective motorcycle tire;And the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dumps a $52M punitive damages verdict in White v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
It would be a user right.Originality v. novelty - copyright and patent. [read post]