Search for: "People v. McKenna"
Results 181 - 200
of 206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
McKenna, of Olympia. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
McKenna: it’s a statement about people who buy Louis Vuitton. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Mark McKenna: The issue is people who conclude that making you think harder in any way is a search cost. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm
As mentioned earlier in the week, Facebook has changed their privacy settings; once again, the social network has people concerned. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
(I think this claim makes Mark McKenna’s point quite well: TM’s key wrong turn came when it abandoned competition. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:57 am
What about the people who make up that profession? [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
I even got comments from people that thought I was "absurd" for not listing them. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:26 am
Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
First, SLP joins folks around the globe including everybody here in blogspace in congratulating CNSA and the people of China on the success of the lunar probe Chang'e I. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
" [emphasis added by LawPundit]In supporting Justice McKenna and in not supporting Justice Harlan, Epstein is as wrong as those who supported Justice Henry Billings Brown (who never earned a law degree) in Plessy v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 10:41 pm
The October 2007 issue of the Oxford University Press monthly Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice leads with an editorial, "Killing the orphans", on the curious position of orphan works within the scheme of copyright law and elsewhere.Right: Killing helpless orphans is a theme that stirs the merciful instincts of many people - but not when it comes to copyright protection.Other features in this issue include* "The interplay between IP rights and… [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
Some people suggest that dilution protection reduces consumer search costs. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:47 pm
Those principles having failed, we return to competition; likewise, people like Mark McKenna are starting to suggest a materiality requirement for infringement. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
To take an example from Mark McKenna, suppose the NYT runs a story truthfully saying "Nike Announces New Shoe Line," and because Nike is so good at marketing consumers assume that Nike authorized that headline. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
From the defense side, Michael Krauss opines on the subject at Point of Law;Mark McKenna has the story of a $15M verdict from a defective motorcycle tire;And the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dumps a $52M punitive damages verdict in White v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 12:58 pm
Bruce McKenna [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:19 pm
Family Investment Corporation v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
It would be a user right.Originality v. novelty - copyright and patent. [read post]
