Search for: "People v. McKenna"
Results 21 - 40
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
” = = = The case cites recent work by Professors Farley & McKenna with regard to some confusion created by Belmora LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
McKenna: passing off used to say: if you’re not trying to serve people any more under the mark, then you aren’t suffering any harm. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
6 May 2022, 9:21 am
From Wednesday's decision of the Rhode Island Supreme Court in Benson v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:08 am
HIIT Peloton classes and our fav teachers Hanna Frankson and Jen Sherman on the bike and Daniel McKenna for strength. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
McKenna: but sometimes the core shifts. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
Legally: Falwell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
It's an odd way to entice people to register...JL: Well, we borrowed incontestability from England, where it works. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:26 am
Mr McGuigan and the daughter of the late Séan McKenna then applied for judicial review of the PSNI’s decision. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm
McKenna & Cuneo (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1194, 1199 (Coscia).) [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Felix Wu: If some people are confused, then you’re mixing up people who are confused and people who experience what the law calls dilution. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm
Mark McKenna: Another explanation was maybe these bespoke regimes weren’t addressing actual problems; overrepresentation of people w/specific litigation interests. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
” and also people worried about liability so they may not opt out. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:25 am
In Miami Herald v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
McKenna (W.D. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Protection v. enforcement: even if protected as a TM, the scope may be limited. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 12:38 pm
McKenna, 881 F. [read post]
