Search for: "People v. McKenna"
Results 41 - 60
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Mark McKenna: really stuck on the label “endorsement” for a dead person. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am
Estimable v. irreparable seems like another axis worth thinking about, as does discrete v. ongoing behavior. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
If Amazon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Sarah Burstein: Reichman is worried that designs can’t satisfy nonobviousness—but the Federal Circuit has removed constraints.Reichman: the Fed Cir has improved it; but still, nonobviousness means that people don’t apply—the lawyers tell the designer there’s no chance. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
They raise the price, eliminate competition, cut people out, transfer consumer surplus to themselves—but they are also giving something to people who canafford the chair: a chair with more narrative and thus more market value. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
I have just now gotten around to my notes from this excellent roundtable.Introduction: Mark McKenna & Graeme DinwoodieWhy do a roundtable like this? [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Consider Yick Wo v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
So too w/litigation/cancellation.Mark McKenna: is there a big problem here? [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
On June 27, Rose Porter picked up a whole hog from Stewart’s Meats in McKenna, Washington. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
Teaching 100 percent of the cases on people kicked by horses will not convey the law of torts very well. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
On 11 July 2019 Master Cook handed down judgment in the case of Osagie v Serco Ltd and Ors [2019] EWHC 1803 (QB). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 10:48 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:17 am
Uncommon, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
Neither right takes precedence over the other and resolution of the conflict requires an “intense focus on the facts” as per the decision in McKennitt v Ash. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:35 pm
People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Consider Milstein v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
TM law says that if people think both would produce, then they’re in the same market. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
YSL v. [read post]
