Search for: "People v. McKenna" Results 81 - 100 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2017, 11:25 am by Bill Amadeo
People seem to think that Justice Joseph McKenna created the term in the famous Hall case but that’s not actually factual (Hall v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
May not be case by case but we have to figure out where and why to draw lines, some of which will be normative but not all.McKenna: surveys directed at words—Gucci v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
McKenna 2018 Contact: contact@chiefjusticekerwin.ca Excerpts from various chapters From Chapter 2: Growing Up – Sarnia According to an oft-repeated story in our family, Patrick, at the age of fourteen, decided to quit high school and get a job to help out with the family’s finances. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
RT: McKenna says: Might expect that skills would be transferable to new geographic areas, but less so in other product markets. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (McKenna Q: is there a clear distinction?) [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
I even got comments from people that thought I was "absurd" for not listing them. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” and also people worried about liability so they may not opt out. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Mark McKenna: really stuck on the label “endorsement” for a dead person. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sarah Burstein: Reichman is worried that designs can’t satisfy nonobviousness—but the Federal Circuit has removed constraints.Reichman: the Fed Cir has improved it; but still, nonobviousness means that people don’t apply—the lawyers tell the designer there’s no chance. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: some people incl. [read post]