Search for: "People v. McKenna"
Results 121 - 140
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Expressive content of photos can be entirely unaltered—Dillon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Lenz v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am
[McKenna’s channeling? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
In TM: Reynolds Wrap v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:56 pm
Like Holmes in INS v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Rules v. standards—some carveouts are one, some the other. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Cf. 4thcircuit’s AOL v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 10:14 am
The panel held that the district court did not err by declining to make findings regarding the Treaty’s meaning to the Yakama people at the time of its signing because the meaning to the Yakama people could not overcome the clear words of the Treaty. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Cambridge v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Mark McKenna: The Implications of Blackhorse v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:26 am
Yellow Group LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
In Blackhorse v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
This is preclusion, or as Mark McKenna has called it, channeling. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
RT: McKenna says: Might expect that skills would be transferable to new geographic areas, but less so in other product markets. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
McKenna: marketing literature has some answers there.Bone: still normative.McKenna: normative to say “too close,” but descriptive to say there are degrees of closeness.Bone: in a sense blurring and tarnishment are similar. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
McKenna: registration system is driven by a sense of geographic expansion [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 5:49 pm
It’s funny what people will put out as satire and art nowadays—though, I don’t have any thing wrong with it. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
