Search for: "People v. McKinney" Results 41 - 60 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm by Dale Carpenter
” When certain people see a married gay couple their thoughts drift to sodomy. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 4:24 am by Linda Hazelton
v=OYEA7i1rqDk&t=399sPhoto:  Jeremy McKinney [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:02 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
McKinney Arizona, 1972, and State v Nilsen, 1983, the court noted the following: Law enforcement’s actions must have induced the defendant to commit a crime that they would otherwise no [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:46 am by SHG
In the case at hand, The State of New Hampshire v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
In other news, Ministers have been urged to reassess the law giving anonymity for people making allegations about sexual offences. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Above all, these acts are crimes against the People of the State of New York and Society must be considered as well as the 'family tranquility.' Finally, this Court must take note of the recent decision in the case of People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
McKinney School of Law, has posted How Did the Bill of Rights Become the Bill of Rights? [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
” In his history of the University of Toronto libraries, Blackburn took issue with being portrayed as simply wanting to exclude people. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal, the issues… [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]