Search for: "People v. McKinney"
Results 61 - 80
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 5:54 am
People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
McKinney, 5th District holds that speedy trial on latter OVI charge did not begin to run until time of charge, not time of arrest… In State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:52 pm
In People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Ct. 1744 (2017). [9] Rosenberger v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
In another 5-4 decision, the court ruled against a death-row inmate in McKinney v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
"], lv to appeal denied, 13 NY3d 748 [2009]; People v Abdullah, 23 Misc 3d 232, 234 (Crim Ct, Kings County 2008] ["Because New York does not have a complete ban on the possession of handguns in the home... [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
” When certain people see a married gay couple their thoughts drift to sodomy. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
Campo and Kushner v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 2:46 pm
McKinney v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:16 pm
McKinney's Statutes section 240; Golden v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
Furthermore, prohibition is never available merely to correct or prevent a mistake, error in procedure, or error in substantive law (see Matter of Oglesby v McKinney, 7 NY3d at 565; Matter of Morgenthau v Altman, 58 NY2d at 1058), even when such errors may be "grievous" (La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d at 579), or "egregious" (Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d at 62). [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 2:24 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
McKinney (23-367) The circuit court split in this case is over the tests used by federal courts to consider temporary injunctions in labor disputes. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 12:50 pm
But, due to the influence - up till now - of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
