Search for: "People v. McKinney"
Results 101 - 120
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm
Aug. 30, 2011) and McKinney v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
Furthermore, prohibition is never available merely to correct or prevent a mistake, error in procedure, or error in substantive law (see Matter of Oglesby v McKinney, 7 NY3d at 565; Matter of Morgenthau v Altman, 58 NY2d at 1058), even when such errors may be "grievous" (La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d at 579), or "egregious" (Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d at 62). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
Hawkins-McKinney… Although I give the 6th a hard time in a sentencing decision (see below), it makes up for it with an excellent decision in State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
"]; People v Olah, 300 NY 96, 102 [1949] ["A statute must be construed and applied as it is written by the Legislature, not as some judges may believe it should have been written. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
McKinney, 5th District holds that speedy trial on latter OVI charge did not begin to run until time of charge, not time of arrest… In State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:24 pm
This effective racial segregation led to the same types of separate and unequal schools held unconstitutional in the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
In People v Tomasik, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals judgment and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with People v Stanaway, 446 Mich 643 (1994). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
Penal Law § 240.20 (McKinney 2008); N.D. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Preface… Before I jump into this decision by a U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Justice BhatThe Delhi High Court in Shri Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr., has examined the concept of DNA testing and the law pertaining to the same. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:17 am
The internet was developed by people who clearly knew and loved Adam’s books. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:54 am
Long, 64 M.J. 57 (C.M.A. 2006); People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:55 am
Judge Kathleen O'Malley recently handed down an interesting opinion in a consumer class action case styled McKinney v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:54 am
People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:47 pm
" Uccello v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
NO-FAULT – CRIMINAL LAW – FALSIFYING "BUSINESS RECORDS" People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:26 am
State v. [read post]
