Search for: "People v. McKinney" Results 101 - 120 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am by SHG
Furthermore, prohibition is never available merely to correct or prevent a mistake, error in procedure, or error in substantive law (see Matter of Oglesby v McKinney, 7 NY3d at 565; Matter of Morgenthau v Altman, 58 NY2d at 1058), even when such errors may be "grievous" (La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d at 579), or "egregious" (Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d at 62). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Hawkins-McKinney… Although I give the 6th a hard time in a sentencing decision (see below), it makes up for it with an excellent decision in State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
"]; People v Olah, 300 NY 96, 102 [1949] ["A statute must be construed and applied as it is written by the Legislature, not as some judges may believe it should have been written. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
McKinney, 5th District holds that speedy trial on latter OVI charge did not begin to run until time of charge, not time of arrest… In State v. [read post]
This effective racial segregation led to the same types of separate and unequal schools held unconstitutional in the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Tomasik, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals judgment and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with People v Stanaway, 446 Mich 643 (1994). [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
Justice BhatThe Delhi High Court in Shri Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr., has examined the concept of DNA testing and the law pertaining to the same. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:17 am
 The internet was developed by people who clearly knew and loved Adam’s books. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:55 am by Russell Jackson
Judge Kathleen O'Malley recently handed down an interesting opinion in a consumer class action case styled McKinney v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]