Search for: "People v. McKinney"
Results 121 - 140
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2010, 3:26 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:52 am
(The first-degree statute was amended in 1998 to overrule People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
23 May 2009, 4:06 am
" People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
McKinney, Blomquist discusses the history of innovation and creativity in law — which is by its very nature is a conservative profession. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 2:08 pm
Supreme Court therefore was required to impose a term of imprisonment upon that conviction (Penal Law § 70.08 [3] [c]; § 120.05 [7]), and thus was also required to order a presentence report prior to imposing the bargained-for sentence (see generally People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 238, cert denied 419 US 1122; Preiser, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 11A, CPL 390.20). [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:56 pm
" After considering the McKinney approach to the section 15 analysis, the Arbitrator observed that:"To have a law, in this case, the policy, forcing all members of the group, in this case people who have turned 65, to retire from their jobs not only perpetuates stereotypes about the value of older workers, but of necessity results, given its broad base application and complete failure to entertain or consider individual circumstances, in a loss of individual… [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:08 pm
Combs v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 5:22 pm
Combs v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:16 pm
McKinney's Statutes section 240; Golden v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:48 pm
As Marlene Martin, executive director of the Campaign to End the Death Penalty says, "I think of people like Troy Davis, Rodney Reed and Timothy McKinney -- all on death row, all African American, all poor and almost all surely innocent. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
[iii] Springer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:51 am
A prosecutor who wishes to remain anonymous has this to say in response to my Us v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:01 am
Shannon Quadros wrote, in comments to Us v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:06 pm
By Troy McKinney, a lawyer's lawyer (in fact, my lawyer), a few of the differences between prosecutors and defenders:They take away people's lives.We give people their lives back.They break up familles.We help families stay together.They cause and maximize pain.We prevent or minimize pain.They judge.We forgive.Their solutions are usually destructive.Our solutions are usually constructive.They cause kids to visit parents in prison.We prefer that kids and parents… [read post]
