Search for: "People v. McRae"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
In People v Collins, 60 NY2d 214, 218 [1983], the Court of Appeals held that voice identifications are subject to the same concerns relative to suggestiveness, and same constitutional safeguards, as visual identifications (see also, People v McRae, 195 AD2d 180, 185 [1st Dept 1994]; People v Shepard, 162 AD2d 226 [1st Dept 1990], lv den, 76 NY2d 944). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:33 am
He is understood to have been heading for Union Street to tell people about Hollie’s case and his plans to contest the Aberdeen South parliamentary seat as an independent candidate. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 7:57 am
Horton v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
Pierre v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
STATE V. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am
Her pioneering achievements will be an inspiration to people both within and outside the College, and I very much look forward to welcoming her to Oxford. [read post]
19 May 2022, 1:00 am
See Alborg v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:55 pm
Corbin refers to Lemon v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:09 am
McRae. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:37 pm
McRae, 448 U.S 297, 319-20 (1980). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm
McRae, 203 N.C. [read post]
10 May 2022, 1:06 pm
McRae, 448 U.S 297, 319-20 (1980). [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:28 am
See Gillette v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
The Court overturned the convictions in the Moore et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 7:31 am
From Judge Travis McDonough's opinion Thursday in Riley v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
Harris v McRae held that a ‘negative’ right to abortion required no positive state funding, upholding the Hyde Amendment that excluded funding coverage for medically necessary abortions from an otherwise comprehensive Medicaid program. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Frey v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
In Bray v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
In Bray v. [read post]
