Search for: "People v. Meals"
Results 1 - 20
of 549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2010, 2:01 pm
But they can't decide whether people work during other parts of the day. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
Instead, this case is analogous to People ex rel. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
In People ex rel. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 10:17 am
Ferra v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:33 am
Last week, the California Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
" In the 1600s, people were saying "luncheon" to refer to a meal, and it was originally a snack between breakfast and the midday meal (called "dinner"):a1652 R. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
Timothy's Episcopal Church v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:05 am
Timothy’s meal program more than two days per week to ensure that people in need can have access to at least one hot, nutritious meal every day of the week.... [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
People seem to forget that the Court has no deadline for hearing cases on its docket, as demonstrated by the fact that it took more than five years to decide Martinez v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:45 am
v=FJ_MOIIdWrw Originally posted at InjuryBoard by John Hopkins [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 6:09 pm
We discuss the unicorn known as the “on-duty meal period” by chatting about L'Chaim House, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm
In Augustus v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
Ask the next ten people you meet, what is a meal? [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:33 pm
This basically entails buying meals for government officials and others and taking them to sporting events. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:54 am
The California Supreme Court held in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
One of the things we discussed at last week's wage & hour seminar in Costa Mesa was the long list of questions that remain unanswered after Murphy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 4:19 pm
Marlo v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:13 am
Harris v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:02 am
She's been committed to California Psychiatric Transition for the past five years, and seems to continue to have schizophrenia.But isn't it interesting how one tends to interpret behavior depending upon what one expects.For example, as part of establishing how Rosalinda is still mentally disabled, the Court of Appeal notes that "Rosalinda had recently begun to exhibit other symptoms indicating poor impulse control, such as urinating on herself on purpose in order to achieve other ends, like… [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 4:30 am
Cosby v. [read post]
