Search for: "People v. Melendez"
Results 41 - 60
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
For example the Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:57 pm
, Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
In Robert Young v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of Melendez-Diaz vs. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
The Court then determined that this error was harmless, since the defendant had confessed.Whether the holding of People v Brown (13 NY3d 332) was correct will likely be decided by the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
(Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
On March 4, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals approved its opinion in People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
The State argued that in this way the rule was akin to the notice and demand statutes approved in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:27 pm
MNN aired the video once but then banned it from the air, citing what it described as threatening language from Melendez: “Our people, our people, people of color, are in control of this building and I have to wait until they are fired, or they retire, or someone kills them so that I can come and have access to the facility here. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am
“ I’d suggested at the time that the opinion was possibly too broad, and sure enough, a year later, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the much-anticipated opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 7:47 am
The video of oral argument before the 9th Circuit in Baca v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:16 am
In People v. [read post]
