Search for: "People v. Melendez"
Results 61 - 80
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Illinois, No. 10-8505, seeking review of People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Illinois, No. 10-8505, seeking review of People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:31 pm
" In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 4:52 pm
Id. at 45.As noted by Justice Souter in his dissenting opinion in Kansas v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
For example, in Melendez–Diaz v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:09 pm
Justice Kavanaugh with opinion in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Sure, the requirements of the unavailability of the witness in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
Well, only four days after the Court decided Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:16 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
Since Crawford was decided, courts have struggled to come up with a comprehensive definition of the term "testimonial," but one factor that must be considered is the degree to which a statement is deemed accusatory, i.e., whether it seeks to establish facts essential to the elements of the crimes as ruled in People v Encarnacion, Melendez- Diaz v Massachusetts and People v Rawlins. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 6:54 am
City of Richfield, v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
Washington, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
" Id. citing People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
Finally, in his closing statement, the prosecutor made several "irrelevant comments which [had] no bearing on any legitimate issue in the case" (People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 109) and, in stating that "[p]rosecutors seek justice and juries deliver it in cases such as these," he "exceed[ed] the bounds of legitimate advocacy" (People v Melendez, 11 AD3d 983, 984, lv denied 4 NY3d 888; see People v Benedetto,… [read post]
