Search for: "People v. Mendoza" Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 9:50 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: New Senate Bill Removes “Alien” from California Labor Code, May 10, 2015, The Guardian More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, earlier this year, the New York Court of Appeals held in People v Harnett that a guilty plea to a sex offense is not automatically invalidated because the defendant was not warned that he may be subject to SOMTA. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 9:26 am by Brian Shiffrin
(People v Agee, 57 AD3d 1486, 1487, lv denied 12 NY3d 813; see People v Becoats, 71 AD3d 1578, 1579, affd 17 NY3d 643, cert denied ___ US ___, 132 S Ct 1970; People v Cobb, 72 AD3d 1565, 1565-1566, lv denied 15 NY3d 803). [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
The judge’s decision relied mostly on Supreme Court precedent from Oliver v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am by Rosalind English
Or, more recently and pertinently to this case since it involves discrimination, the case of  Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 where the House of Lords ruled that the relevant provisions of the 1977 Rent Act treats the survivors of homosexual relationships less favourably than survivors of heterosexual relationships. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:20 am by Rosalind English
 The cases on asylum seekers referred to above rely on the right to dignity as a way of channelling social and economic rights through the grid of the ECHR and dignity is of course an oft-cited interest in litigation involving discrimination against homosexuals (see Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza). [read post]