Search for: "People v. Miller"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2009, 9:17 am
Miller. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 8:08 am
People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 pm
Then, in Miller v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule – this is… [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
Miller, on May 15, 1939. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm
People move. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:49 am
Miller's Ale House, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:26 am
It's by John Wagner.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
Incredibly, the cases — from Alabama, Miller v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:55 pm
Miller. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
In California v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 10:30 am
In State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
(Photo by Bruce Bennett Studios/Getty Images) From Allianz Suisse Versicherungs-Gesellschaft v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:23 am
From today's report of newly filed cases: Eric Miller v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 8:37 am
In Miller v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
Case citation: Miller v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 10:28 am
(People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 8:39 am
In a 17 page order, Judge Miller denied Tito’s motion for summary judgement in Hofmann v. [read post]
