Search for: "People v. Miller"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 4:28 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
OK, so the title of this post may be an exaggeration of what is only a passing reference to an old friend in Fareham BC v Miller [2013] EWCA Civ 159. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
OK, so the title of this post may be an exaggeration of what is only a passing reference to an old friend in Fareham BC v Miller [2013] EWCA Civ 159. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:04 am
See, e.g., Mitchell Miller, PC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:43 am
(Will Baude) The New York Times “room for debate” feature is on the surprisingly technical question of the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
Miller, 34 So.3d at 175; Waterbury v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 3:13 pm
In an order filed June 17, 2016, the Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District (Division 2) modified its opinion filed April 22, and ordered partially published May 20, 2016, in People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
He unsuccessfully moved for resentencing in light of Miller v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In 1976, in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 3:42 pm
On August 17, 2016, the California Supreme Court ordered the Fourth District’s opinion in People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 8:16 am
Within seven years that promise was forgotten, and in Miller v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 3:42 pm
The Federal Court of Canada (the “Court”) recently released its decision in Hilton Worldwide Holdings LLP v Miller Thomson, 2018 FC 895. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 pm
Most people seem to think that’s how the law works. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:30 pm
(See more on that score from Mark Bennett at Defending People.) [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
Louisiana 14-280Issue: Whether Miller v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 12:09 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
See also Miller v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm
For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:04 am
Supreme Court decided in Miller v. [read post]
