Search for: "People v. Minor (1980)"
Results 1 - 20
of 319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2025, 7:27 am
Rather than adhere to the federal rules for all elections, Arizona implemented a two-tiered system: people who provide DPOC can vote in state and federal elections, and people who do not can vote in federal elections only. [read post]
20 May 2025, 8:17 am
” Beeman Slip op. at 11 (citing U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am
The strategies of doxing, trolling, conspiracy theories, and memes used by far-right extremists today were developed on white supremacist online bulletin boards in the 1980s and 90s. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 7:06 pm
United States, 446 U.S. 156, 176–77 (1980); Gaston Cty. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2025, 5:01 am
The Court said so unanimously in Matal v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 7:47 am
Relevant Federal Law: Balancing User Privacy with Child Protection In the 1980s, Congress passed a law called the Stored Communications Act (SCA) that created a statutory right of privacy for Americans’ digital files and communications. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
The evisceration of Antitrust since 1980 is another aspect contributing to inequality; it has sanctioned oligopoly and monopoly rents. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 12:35 am
Neil Foster, Law and Religion Australia: Religious faith, medical procedures and minors – H v AC: on a case in which a young person from a “mainstream” Protestant church believed that she had been healed miraculously and that no further treatment was needed. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 6:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm
”In a later case, Doe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm
” The 2024 Annual Report provides a detailed account of the People’s Republic of China‘s (PRC) systematic abuses of human rights—most brutally implemented in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Tibet, and Hong Kong—and documents the widespread use of arbitrary detention and torture targeting ethnic minorities, human rights lawyers, and advocates for free speech, religious freedom, and an independent civil society. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 11:20 am
In Perot v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
And governance in private organizations lacked limits that might protect against tyranny over minorities. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
First, Kerr says that Smith is inconsistent with United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:59 am
Is there online discussion by possibly knowledgeable people about the underlying incident? [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:52 am
It held in 1980 that a federal prisoner could sue his jailers under Bivens. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Rich Ford: Tell us about Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
And for the record, as most people reading this know, I am radically pro-choice and also have always thought Roe and Casey were wrongly decided (30-40 years from now the right to choose will most likely be stronger than at any time between 1980-2022). [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
