Search for: "People v. Minor (1980)" Results 61 - 80 of 362
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But Dinan focuses on something even more important about most of the states: With only one exception (Delaware), they reject what Madison was so proud of in Federalist 63, i.e., the removal from “we the people” of even an iota of an ability to engage in direct governance. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:14 am by John Floyd
  Schedule V   The substances on this schedule have a low potential for abuse and usually consist of substances that are preparations containing narcotics. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
The central part of the 117-page opinion,  captioned Texas v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
The pageant does limit itself to people "born … Female with Female Anatomy. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
Google has announced plans to allow minors age 18 and under to request removal of their images from the company’s search engine. [read post]