Search for: "People v. Minter" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm by Suraj Vyas
Here you are thinking you’re helping because a physical ticket mailed out to people could be lost, burned, copied, etc. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At that point, the culture war over same-sex marriage had begun in earnest: Goodridge v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Minter’s brief gave nearly equal time to the sex discrimination argument. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Mary Bonauto and Shannon Minter point out the resemblances between June Medical Services v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Advocate, Shannon Price Minter worries about the effect of Kavanaugh’s appointment on “LGBTQ people and other vulnerable groups. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
People transferred gold and silver to each other in order to satisfy important obligations as well as to obtain items of more direct and obvious use. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:38 am by INFORRM
In my view, such a law will not be used by the less privileged people in our society. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Day 3 of the trialDan Levine, Lawyers for Prop 8 Point to President Obama’s Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage, The Recorder (SF legal newspaper)Maura Dolan, Psychologist testifies on 'remarkable similarities' of gay and straight couples, 01/14/10 LA TimesLaura Keen, Defense profers a harm: gay male non-monogamy, 01/14/10 Keen News ServiceADF Senior Counsel Jordan Lorence, Updates from the trial, 01/13/10 ADF press releaseNCLR’s Legal Director Shannon Minter on Perry… [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
" The petitioners rely heavily on a 1990 California Supreme Court decision, Raven v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Under California law, a statute enacted by the people through the initiative process may not be repealed or superseded through ordinary legislation. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
(2) During arguments, Justice Carlos Moreno had an interesting exchange that had echoes of Brown v. [read post]