Search for: "People v. Miranda (1994)" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Contrary to ACS's contention, the deprivation of the right to counsel is a [29 A.D.3d 1016] fundamental error warranting reversal (see Matter of Otto v Otto, 26 AD3d 498 [2006]; Matter of Miranda v Vasquez, 14 AD3d 566 [2005]; Matter of Knight v Griffith, 13 AD3d 449 [2004]; Matter of Vladimir M., 206 AD2d 482, 483 [1994]; Matter of Williams v Williams, 91 AD2d 1044, 1045 [1983]). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:34 am
Macklin, 202 A.D.2d 445, 608 N.Y.S.2d 509 (2nd Dept.1994) lv. den. 83 N.Y.2d 912, 614 N.Y.S.2d 394 (1994); People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:19 am by SHG
Ironically, people would have to speak in order to claim their right to remain silent.This position appears more hostile to Miranda than any taken in the Supreme Court by previous Democratic Administrations. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 10:46 pm
Why do people say yes? [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Pre-'Miranda' Statement During 'Interrogation' Denied Suppression as Not Made While in Custody United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 6:21 am
  He was apparently unaware of her Miranda rights. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
A waiver of Miranda rights signed by the defendant was admitted into evidence as People's Exhibit 1. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
He served as dean of the law school from 1987-1994 and provost of the University of Chicago from 1994-2002. [read post]