Search for: "People v. Modell" Results 181 - 200 of 4,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 6:01 am by Jim Singer
In June. the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
Dozens of countries around the world have modeled their constitutions on the U.S Constitution. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 8:48 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
University of Texas at Austin and beyond – with “people of good will. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:35 pm
It seems that the people at Porsche -- yes, the luxury sports car maker -- have sued the footwear folks. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm by Michael Heise
Exploiting the variation in the timing and style of duty to warn laws across states, I use a fixed effects model to find that, all else equal and controlling for the prevalence of crack, mandatory duty to warn laws cause an increase in homicides of 9.5% or 0.83 people per 100,000. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
John Fellas & Pavlos Petrovas, Diag Human SE v Czech Republic-Ministry of Health: A Restrictive Application of the ‘Commercial’ Requirement in New York Convention Cases under US LawMichael Hwang & Aloysius Chang, Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic v Sanum Investments Ltd: A Tale of Two Letters Andrew Newcombe & Jean-Michel Marcoux, Hesham Talaat M. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
This post takes up the questions of how copyright law may impact the development and commercialization of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") tools, given their use of other people's data, generally without prior notice or permission. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:07 pm
Up to this point, these efforts have not changed much in the minds of people in the credit business, as FICO scores are still the standard means of assessing credit risk. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
We haven’t seen courts treat the strict scrutiny test in RFRA laws very seriously in the past, which is why we’ve avoided the “anarchy” Justice Scalia warned about in Employment Div. v. [read post]