Search for: "People v. Modell" Results 201 - 220 of 4,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2009, 1:35 pm
It seems that the people at Porsche -- yes, the luxury sports car maker -- have sued the footwear folks. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm by Michael Heise
Exploiting the variation in the timing and style of duty to warn laws across states, I use a fixed effects model to find that, all else equal and controlling for the prevalence of crack, mandatory duty to warn laws cause an increase in homicides of 9.5% or 0.83 people per 100,000. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
John Fellas & Pavlos Petrovas, Diag Human SE v Czech Republic-Ministry of Health: A Restrictive Application of the ‘Commercial’ Requirement in New York Convention Cases under US LawMichael Hwang & Aloysius Chang, Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic v Sanum Investments Ltd: A Tale of Two Letters Andrew Newcombe & Jean-Michel Marcoux, Hesham Talaat M. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
This post takes up the questions of how copyright law may impact the development and commercialization of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") tools, given their use of other people's data, generally without prior notice or permission. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:07 pm
Up to this point, these efforts have not changed much in the minds of people in the credit business, as FICO scores are still the standard means of assessing credit risk. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
We haven’t seen courts treat the strict scrutiny test in RFRA laws very seriously in the past, which is why we’ve avoided the “anarchy” Justice Scalia warned about in Employment Div. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The CBA sought to bring the Model Code into alignment with the federal Divorce Act, RSC 1985 c 3 (2nd Supp), Canada’s ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (“UNCRC”) and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (“UNDRIP”), as well as existing family law “practice guidelines” (p. 1-2). [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 10:55 am
A lot of those people are 15 and in scantily clad or suggestive photos. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
And indeed many restrictions focus on particular places — sidewalks outside people’s homes (Frisby v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am by JB
The answer that people gave was that as long as limits on association were symmetrical between the races, they were constitutional.We can see this logic at work in Pace v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
In summary, they raised the following points:Diminished capacity was first recognized as a defense in 1973 by People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:26 pm by Jon Gelman
But our investigation found the situation was much more serious and now OSHA is investigating this case once again.For most people, controlling a model plane is a lot easier than flying a real one. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:48 pm by Unknown
Hump (Indian Loan Guarentee and Insurance Program)Berry v. [read post]