Search for: "People v. Modell" Results 261 - 280 of 4,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm by Jeff Vail
 But this rarely does away with the Catch-22 caused by existing models of experience and billing. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Results don’t reflect inputs/the model itself doesn’t contain the inputs, so people will just train the models outside Europe. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:48 am by Guest Blogger
  But the dynamics of constitutional change are too varied to be captured by such a model, just as they cannot be captured by Article V. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am by James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging
(James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging) HavenCo and Sealand hitched their fates togther for a while, but the two had very different models. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm by Guest Blogger
We the People adopted constitutional changes outside of the procedure stipulated in Article V. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:46 pm by Nicholas Moline
Typically a phone system will also handle voicemail and allow for people to transfer calls from one person to another. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:39 am by Jon
Such things are intensely irritating to people. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
To train these models, AI developers have relied on millions of texts and images created by real people—and some of them aren’t very happy that their work has been used without their permission. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The first issue in the case was roughly modelled after United States v. [read post]