Search for: "People v. Modell" Results 601 - 620 of 4,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Some commenters on my Large Libel Model posts have argued that the reason I got false output from my prompts is that I had "primed" the model to suggest that I was looking for something negative. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Last week marked the 60th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am by centerforartlaw
Their business model allows companies to lease the right to use and profit from their immersive experiences. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ah, how I wish courts would apply the same scrutiny to trademark harm stories.FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm by John Ross
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
 Protecting critical services is essential to the American people’s confidence in the nation’s infrastructure and the economy, and the Strategy breaks out three categories of activity to accomplish this objective: Scale Public-Private Collaboration. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]