Search for: "People v. Modell"
Results 681 - 700
of 4,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 2:19 pm
Family Investment Corporation v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:53 am
As a felon-Dad, when my world went bust (from white collar financial crime), with wise counsel I took one of my most important life lessons from Iran-Contra ringleader Major General Richard V. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm
(May 15, 2013) [2] Fraley v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:10 pm
S. 351; Lewis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:04 pm
" But NRA v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:29 am
Town of Atherton v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
(That’s what happened in US v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
Some people are cheering and some people are shrugging in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Star Athletica v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
(the question mark is part of his surname and not a typographical mistake) and colleagues wrote: “We model a zombie attack using biological assumptions based on popular zombie movies. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
49% thought native ads were unpaid v. 12% for non-native; remainder unsure.What if we tweak the label? [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
As the court noted recently in Riley v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
Some folks think it means surveillance of many people at once. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
Will Gill v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:07 pm
In its opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm
This order comes after an activist judge ruled that DHS could not outright end the CHNV program.Although it is hard to get past the gratuitously harsh tone and vacuous criticism of the Biden administration and the district court judge in the case, it is not hard to see why DHS found Friday’s ruling worth noting; people on both sides of the immigration battles seem to agree that termination of CHNV could have major consequences for those individuals involved, and for the nation more… [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:20 pm
Hustler v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 2:24 pm
A dozen years before Congress proposed the Twenty-Second Amendment, the Supreme Court decided Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Having said that, however, the time and effort expended to date are sunk costs.[12] Granted, many people are not very good at ignoring sunk costs.[13] Ignoring sunk costs, however, is precisely what rational decision makers – including the ALI – ought to do.[14] The basic problem with the proposed Restatement of the Law of Corporate Governance is that corporate law is not a suitable subject for being restated. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:50 am
I hope to blog a good deal about today's Janus v. [read post]
