Search for: "People v. Montes" Results 141 - 160 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
(Green Patent Blog)   Global - Copyright Conference calls on WIPO to boost support for collective management of copyright and related rights (WIPO) Librarians take the copyright battleground in developing countries (Intellectual Property Watch) Creative Commons study on how people understand the term ‘noncommercial use’ (Creative Commons)   Africa Time to follow the example of Nashville? [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
To this the Court replied: The refusal to serve food to pedestrians at drive-through windows does not impact blind people differently or in a greater manner than the significant population of non-disabled people who lack access to motor vehicles. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
I think another piece of this that might be important to think about too, though, is that we don't want people entering pleas without the necessary lab testing.Scott Henson: That's right. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 7:07 am by Derek T. Muller
Their job is to see that the school turns out properly educated people who can adequately serve the public. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[7]  Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8]  These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
First, the criminal defamation statute arguably fails to provide "people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" and what speech is acceptable…. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Knight First Amendment Institute, 20-197, involving the constitutionality of Trump blocking people on twitter, should be vacated under Munsingwear. [read post]