Search for: "People v. Montes" Results 161 - 180 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am by nyinjuries
Monte Carlo, LLC, (Nassau County, Supreme Court Index # 016489/2007) made the front page of today’s New York Law Journal. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 2:18 pm
People v Montes, 534, 3418/04, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 8680; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Squibb & Sons, 592 P.2d 1383, 1388 (Mont. 1979), and Dion v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:30 am
I spoke to Frank Vargo, one of their trade experts, who is very frustrated that some people are convinced that free trade agreements cause the loss of U.S. jobs. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The Administration had an opportunity to negotiate and submit to Congress for approval an agreement that would have ensured that the benefits of trade flow broadly to working people, small farmers and society at large, as well as to larger businesses. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
(Green Patent Blog)   Global - Copyright Conference calls on WIPO to boost support for collective management of copyright and related rights (WIPO) Librarians take the copyright battleground in developing countries (Intellectual Property Watch) Creative Commons study on how people understand the term ‘noncommercial use’ (Creative Commons)   Africa Time to follow the example of Nashville? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]