Search for: "People v. Moody" Results 21 - 40 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Justin (Gus) Hurwitz
Vullo, which yielded a 9-0 opinion against jawboning—or the “use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action”—and the NetChoice cases, Moody v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Lee Wilson leads the new “legal history emphasis area” in the Department of History and Geography’s at Clemson University (Clemson News).Here is the historians' amicus brief in the free speech case, Moody v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by David Greene
The through-line of these cases is a critically important principle that sets limits on government’s ability to control the online speech of people who use social media, as well as the social media sites themselves: internet users’ First Amendment rights to speak on social media—whether by posting or commenting—may be infringed by the government if it interferes with content moderation, but will not be infringed by the independent decisions of the platforms… [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 2:17 pm by Eric Goldman
And arguably the US government routinely engages in influence operations–maybe covert, maybe not–against the American people too. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm by Colin O'Keefe
As mentioned earlier in the week, Facebook has changed their privacy settings; once again, the social network has people concerned. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
R. v Moodie, 2016 ONSC 3469 [6] It should be obvious to any outside observer that the income thresholds being used by Legal Aid Ontario do not bear any reasonable relationship to what constitutes poverty in this country. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
It will be much more useful for those on a mission to harvest for the purpose of ensuring a more efficient way of managing people, views, beliefs, cognition, etc. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
As you recall, in December, a federal district court enjoined most of HB 20, Texas’ so-called “social media censorship” law. [read post]