Search for: "People v. Moore (1988)" Results 21 - 40 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Co–op., Inc., 838 F.2d 268, 273 (8th Cir. 1988). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, 477 n.9 (Cal. 1988); Stevens v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Pa. 1988) (parties "cannot be compelled to translate foreign language documents for the benefit of their adversary"); Cook v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 533 N.E.2d 748, 755 (Ohio 1988). [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
I Between 1988 and 1989, respondent Francisco Espinosa obtained four federally guaranteed student loans for a total principal amount of $13,250. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
App. 1979) (a federal decision supports case-by-case).Iowa: Moore v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:27 am by Howard Knopf
Within no time, Minister Clement called it “nonsensical” and Minister Moore said “Consumers deserve lower, not higher taxes. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]