Search for: "People v. Mullins" Results 21 - 40 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
And to me it is one of the most despicable pieces of rhetoric that people can use to—to use their religion to hurt others. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 6:30 am by Dariely Rodriguez
This week, the Supreme Court handed down a much-anticipated decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment New York Police Department Sergeants Lose FLSA Bid To Overtime Pay Between April 2001 and August 2004 Mullins v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:14 pm by Shardha Rajam & Mihika Poddar
Mullins protested against this discriminatory action and complained to the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am by Ben
Imagine if Russia doesn’t like what people are saying about Putin. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
In July 2012, Charlie Craig and Dave Mullins, together with Charlie’s mother Debbie Munn, went to Masterpiece Cakeshop, a Denver-area bakery, to purchase a cake for their wedding reception. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 5:49 pm by Colin O'Keefe
It’s funny what people will put out as satire and art nowadays—though, I don’t have any thing wrong with it. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:19 am by Eric Goldman
As just one example (there are a couple dozen such zingers in the opinion): “Meta cites Sheppard, Mullin for the proposition that contracts may only be invalidated as contrary to public policy where they implicate express law, which is the opposite of what that case says. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
At madisonian.net, Michael Risch discusses last week’s arguments in Alice Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:45 am
In 2017, the Washington Supreme Court ruled unanimously for the same-sex couple in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
In Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Mullins v Smith [2018] UKSC 29, the Supreme Court held that the sole test in deciding whether someone is a worker is whether there is an obligation of personal performance. [read post]