Search for: "People v. Municipal Court (1970)" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2008, 10:23 am
As I explained last fall, in two decisions issued in the 1970s the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:09 am by Evan M. Levow
DWI attorney Evan Levow advocates for the rights of people who are facing alleged DWI charges in New Jersey municipal courts. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
In the early 1970s, New Hampshire disqualified citizens from voting in a municipality if they had a “firm intention” of leaving that town at a fixed time in the future. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
Under the Warren Court precedent of Fay v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 9:36 am by Holly Doremus
The court is at some pains to distinguish the Maui case from Ecological Rights Foundation v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Blais v Alberta (Minister of Municipal Affairs), 2018 ABQB 71 [69] The Minister submits that it was her discretionary policy decision to make the Report available to the public, in order to ensure transparency and accountability to the people of Alberta. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by Eugene Volokh
The Journey 4 Justice members were found guilty by the Topeka Municipal Court but are now appealing to the Topeka District Court, where they will get a new trial. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
"Then there's the anti-hippie ordinance (which prohibited people from sitting in a park at Carmel-by-the-Sea), which the California Supreme Court struck down in 1971 in  Parr v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:57 am by Richard Primus
  The Court rejected that interpretation, reasoning that a decision based on cost and community disruption would always favor building highways through parkland, which is already municipally owned and where people do not live, such that adopting the Secretary's interpretation would make the statutory requirement close to pointless. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:47 pm
On the other hand, the courts have carved out exceptions to the application of constitutionally derived obligations when states are said to act as common people--as market participants rather than as regulators. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]