Search for: "People v. Murphy" Results 421 - 440 of 606
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 2:35 pm by Rekha Arulanantham
   From left to right: Palafox, Lawrence, Saenz, Murphy Panelist Victor Palafox, a community organizer who was born in Mexico but has called Alabama home most of his life, understands what these young people are going through. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
As to the first, no privilege arose on the facts; and, even if one did, the interests of justice required that it be precluded (Smurfit Paribas Bank Ltd v AAB Export Finance Ltd [1990] 1 IR 469 (SC); Murphy v Kirwan [1993] 3 IR 501 (SC); Miley v Flood [2001] 1 ILRM 489, [2001] 2 IR 50, [2001] IEHC 9 (24 January 2001); Fyffes v DCC [2005] 1 IR 59 (SC), [2005] IESC 3 (27 January 2005) applied). [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm by Lawrence Higgins
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:51 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Murphy, 296 Or. 610, 678 P.2d 1210, 1218 (1984) (Oregon abolishes the fireman’s rule at common law). [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:48 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Protecting privacy: Beyond the ConstitutionMost legal privacy protections in federal law arise from statutes, not Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, and scholar Erin Murphy has helpfully compiled and analyzed those statutory provisions, noting that "at least four Supreme Court justices recently suggested in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This morning, I read an excellent law-review article (no, not entirely an oxymoron) from Erin Murphy at NYU titled "Databases, Doctrine, and Constitutional Criminal Procedure," found via CrimProf Blog, related to a subject that comes up now and again on Grits: The way databases and their usually unintentional inaccuracies can create constitutional liberty violations for which the US Supreme Court in Herring v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
Doolittle - (1998) (various animals) (Eddie Murphy) 49. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Now that the thread has mostly settled down, I thought I’d cite the case: It’s Murphy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
”  For the young people here, no matter your political affiliation, I can tell you that involvement in a presidential campaign was exciting — not for the chance to personally interact with the candidate or help develop his positions on issues; the best experiences were canvassing door to door with my kids in northwest Des Moines and northeast Philadelphia; personally observing the Iowa caucus take place in a high school cafeteria; and passing out leaflets at the train… [read post]