Search for: "People v. Murphy"
Results 81 - 100
of 610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 10:44 am
In that sense, the opinion reminds me of Murphy v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:51 pm
That outcome has changed since the Supreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
This morning, I read an excellent law-review article (no, not entirely an oxymoron) from Erin Murphy at NYU titled "Databases, Doctrine, and Constitutional Criminal Procedure," found via CrimProf Blog, related to a subject that comes up now and again on Grits: The way databases and their usually unintentional inaccuracies can create constitutional liberty violations for which the US Supreme Court in Herring v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:28 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
STATE V. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 1:02 pm
Superior Court Justice Michaela Murphy delayed a ruling on the case just earlier this week, remanding the case until the US Supreme Court’s final decision in Trump v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:38 pm
On August 20, 2018, Governor Murphy issued Executive Order No. 34 grossly limiting the hunting of black bears in the State. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:49 am
In a recent case, Murphy-Hylton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
" The case in question is Peabody v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In Clark v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:16 pm
Murphy. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
STATE V. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Murphy was a racist bigot. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
& RICHARD MURPHY, 1 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PRACTICE §3.13 (3d ed. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 9:00 pm
Belote v. [read post]
