Search for: "People v. Murphy" Results 141 - 160 of 612
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2021, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Although courts have noted in Bruff-Murphy v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
If enforced, the rule might have removed nearly 700,000 people from the program. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection London company Pension House Exchange (PHE) has been fined £45,000 for making more than 39,000 nuisance calls to people about their pensions. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
There is also renewed bipartisan interest in a federal remedy that would restrict states’ ability to impose income taxes on people not physically present in the state. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
Voter suppression can help minority interests remain in power and a pervasive feeling that our government’s priorities do not truly reflect the will of the people. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:08 pm by Emily Galik
Murphy’s case—known as Sharp v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Murphy was a racist bigot. [read post]