Search for: "People v. Murray" Results 1 - 20 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2007, 2:48 am
Celebrities enjoy no extra right to privacy Murray v Express Newspapers plc and Another “Where an individual was engaged in innocuous, routine activity in a public place, such as a street, that activity attracted no right or expectation of privacy and, accordingly, there was no prohibition on the taking or publishing of photographs of famous people engaged in such activity in a public place unless there were special circumstances such as harassment or distress… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm by Eve Ross
LGBTQ+ people have contributed more to the rule of law than is generally known. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
In the significant New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Murray v Wishart ([2014] NZCA 461) the judges unanimously ruled that a third party publisher (the owner of a Facebook page that contained comments by others) was not liable for other people’s comments simply because he “ought to have known” that they contain defamatory material (even if he didn’t actually know of the content of the comments). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
Quarter, a tribute that should encourage more people to recognize Pauli Murray’s name [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by Legal Beagle
The case of Tods Murray v Arakin and Mr McNamara’s position as a “Vexatious Litigant” featured in the Sunday Herald :  A-courting we will go ... [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
A jury convicted Murray Hammer of injury to a child, P.H. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:30 am
Because Murray clearly engaged in egregious misconduct that prejudiced defendant’s constitutional right to counsel, the trial court was correct in finding Murray’s actions were outrageous and conscience shocking in a constitutional sense. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:02 am by royblack
., what people say and think about you. [read post]