Search for: "People v. Newman" Results 1 - 20 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2016, 10:21 am by John Jascob
Even if liability turned solely on Newman, the SEC continued, the conduct remains illegal because unlike Holley, the insiders in Newman tipped only casual acquaintances, not close friends or family members, and did not intend to benefit the people they tipped. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by John Jascob
Moreover, even if an element of a pecuniary benefit from tippee to tipper was required, as Gupta argued, such a benefit was proved against Gupta at trial (U.S. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
"On the evening of December 28, 2000, defendant called a Long Beach Pizza Hut restaurant and ordered a pizza. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Otherwise, the market will have two categories of investors: regular people and people who are friends and families of insiders, said Kim.Avakian agreed. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:49 pm by Patti Spencer
This seems obvious, but most people will not let their intentions be known ahead of time. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am by NL
This may be one of the more esoteric points to be heard by the Court of Appeal on terms of a lease, but one of the issues in Newman v Framewood Manor Management Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 159 was whether Mrs Newman was entitled to damages for loss of amenity for not being provided with a contractual jacuzzi but rather a sauna by the Defendant lessor. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am by NL
This may be one of the more esoteric points to be heard by the Court of Appeal on terms of a lease, but one of the issues in Newman v Framewood Manor Management Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 159 was whether Mrs Newman was entitled to damages for loss of amenity for not being provided with a contractual jacuzzi but rather a sauna by the Defendant lessor. [read post]