Search for: "People v. Norred" Results 1 - 20 of 10,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
Some of you might remember an AWA case in Florida that I blogged about some time ago: People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:32 am
Nor probably someone you really want to meet in prison, either. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 10:40 am
Were two people who were in a long term exclusive romantic relationship, but had not ever lived together, nor shared their money, living in a marriage-like relationship? [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:09 pm
(D) Neither (A) nor (B).Personally, I think that (D) is the answer least likely to be true.Regardless, the defendant is sentenced to death, and the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:39 am
"[U]tterly defective" search warrant for a pool hall that described neither the place to be searched nor the things to be seized that led to 50 people being searched led to suppression. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
  Nor do Justices Werdegar and Moreno, who dissent.But Justice Baxter makes a nonfrivolous argument to the contrary, and persuades the remainder of the California Supreme Court.It's a tough call. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Danielle Wild
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday’s disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us – People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:12 am by Walter Olson
Neither Stephen Bainbridge nor Larry Ribstein is particularly impressed by it. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:56 am
 Nor do I think that the relevant brand needs to get any more publicity.But in four different places in this opinion, Justice Benke refers to one of the victims as exclusively smoking "Marlborough cigarettes". [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
Giving a massage on a conscious person that starts consensually but then goes beyond the bounds of a legtimate massage constitutes neither "rape by a foreign object on an unconscious person" nor "oral copulation on an unconscious person" when the person remains conscious and demonstrably able to object.It's battery. [read post]