Search for: "People v. Norris" Results 61 - 80 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2014, 9:42 pm
The Judge held that the average consumer included people in the Jack Wills target group, namely younger people, but also included older people, including those who purchased clothes as gifts for younger people. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In this week’s case (Miller v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm by royblack
The Supreme Court again reversed the defendants’ convictions in Norris v Alabama. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Here is what I say about this precise topic in Chapter 4 of my new book, in my discussion of the landmark Warren Court opinion of New York Times v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases include: A woman v The People, Clause 1, 3, 6, 07/06/2012; Mr David Wieberg v The Guardian, Clause 1, 06/06/2012; Mary Reid v Daily Record, Clause 1, 01/06/2012; A woman v Kent & Sussex Courier, Clauses 1, 5, 6 31/05/2012; Adam Wood v Yorkshire Evening Post, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Belinda Cunnison v Berwickshire News, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daventry Express, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Helen… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
& Pol’y 95-118 (2012).Norris, Patricia, Gary Taylor and Mark Wyckoff. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
v=NsJHqstPuNo     UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:01 am by Adam Wagner
In any case, it is important to remember that it was only because of the outrage – prompted in part by the famous Daily Mail “murderers” headline – over the initial failed private prosecution that the law on double jeopardy (trying people for the same crime twice) was changed to allow Dobson and Norris to be tried again. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am by Darren O'Donovan
So, if the ECJ had the power to fine us massively, yes we would have a choice ignore them (like we did when David Norris won his case before the European Court on Human Rights), but when is the freedom to do that cut down to such an extent that the executive has de facto no option but to comply? [read post]