Search for: "People v. North (1982)"
Results 1 - 20
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
The Black Panther Party: Service to the People Programs (The Dr. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:06 pm
Sparrow, the Supreme Court of Canada considered for the first time the scope of section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, which recognizes and affirms the Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Indigenous peoples of Canada. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:10 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:10 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 7:59 am
Thanks to this post at The Volokh Conspiracy, which is titled "Felons and the Right To Bear Arms," I discovered that late yesterday the North Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Britt v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
America’s Communal Utopias (University of North Carolina Press, 1997). [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:07 am
App. 1, (1982). [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Thomas, 458 U.S. 259, 261 (1982) (per curiam) (stating that “the justification to conduct . . . [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
Boyce, Criminal Law 492 (3rd. ed. 1982). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 12:37 pm
And there are older precedents supporting that, too: People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 2:59 pm
Read the decision at: Avanti Mining Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Affecting thousands of people every year.It also involves an important right. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
These laws were subject to litigation, like the McCrory case in North Carolina and Veasey v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
It's really, really hard to cross-examine a transcript, which is why those robed people in D.C. bothered to decide Crawford v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
In cases in which defendants have sought to rely on justification as a defense, the North Carolina courts have referred to the test stated in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
In cases in which defendants have sought to rely on justification as a defense, the North Carolina courts have referred to the test stated in U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court in Woodson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
(People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
The winner of my request for the Llewellyn-like opinion about stopping people is smcelhaney, who pointed me to Judge Pratt's dissent in the 2nd Circuit case of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
Cooke, 306 N.C. 132, 291 S.E.2d 618 (North Carolina Supreme Court 1982). [read post]
