Search for: "People v. North (1982)"
Results 41 - 60
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Synthes North America, Inc., 2009 WL 5110780 (D. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am
This question was answered first when gaming was in its infancy, but still remains quite relevant in today's world of gaming and law.The case in question was Atari v North American Philips Consumer Electronics, decided by the United States Court of Appeals in 1982. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:20 am
In Weber v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
E. coli O157:H7 is responsible for over 90% of the cases of HUS that develop in North America. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
Upshur v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
North Carolina, 428 U. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
More broadly speaking, this case is also a significant step on the long journey of the Metis People towards recognition as unique and rights-bearing aboriginal people, separate and distinct from both the “Indian” (First Nation) and the Inuit peoples, as clearly indicated by s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and by the recent decisions of the SCC relating to the Metis People (Cunningham, Manitoba Metis Federation and Daniels). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
& Rawle 394 (Pa. 1824); People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
She has requested an explanation for the unauthorized use and how the communities in which these cultural expressions were created will benefit.In the letter, certain pieces from the fashion collection are designated as infringing specific Mexican cultural rights, such as garments 8 and 23, whose embroidery is typical of the community of Tenango de Doria; garments 11 and 13, embroideries from the Isthmus of Tehuantepec; and garments 14 and 16, which incorporate the “sarape del… [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
After reading Bush v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Roper v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm
The ICCTA has a “broadly-worded express preemption provision” (quoting People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Chadbourn rarely spoke about personal matters to other people. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
-U.); 1982, ch. 11 (R. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:22 pm
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982); Blatty v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:12 am
In the 1982 landmark case of Plyler v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
This item, the second guest Katpost in succession to emanate from North of the Border, might as well have been entitled "From Glen to Glennie". [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
Recognized analogous grounds under section 15(1) include sexual orientation (Egan v Canada), citizenship status (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia), and marital status (Miron v Trudel). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
