Search for: "People v. North (1982)" Results 81 - 100 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
In this case from the Western District of North Carolina, the defendant was convicted of state child pornography charges and was later convicted in federal court of failure to register as a sex offender. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
Because most people are familiar with Congressional investigations only through television, they assume that if they are caught up in an investigation they will be summoned to testify before a committee like John Dean or Oliver North, with cameras clicking amid vigorous partisan drama. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
DeVries served in the Navy from 1957 to 1960; McAffee served from 1977 to 1980, and 1982 to 1986. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The authors have conducted the first national study of workplace violence against young people in our country. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The story of the ERA—which was revived just recently after having apparently expired in 1982—raises a tension between process and promise. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 6:17 am by Stephen Wermiel
Finally, few people can forget the drama of June 28, 2012, when the Court narrowly upheld the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
This included annual Waitangi Day protests that commenced in the early 1970s and have continued throughout the 2000s. 1975: The Land March, calling for an end to the alienation of Māori land, traveled from the far north of the country to Parliament at the bottom of the North Island, 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) away, with many people joining along the way. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Ill. 1982): Magnavox claimed that Mattel had, through the manufacture, use and sale of Intellivision video games, infringed Magnavox's “Television Gaming Apparatus” patent, issued in 1972.The Magnavox Co. v. [read post]