Search for: "People v. Nye"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:28 pm
From United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Professor Joseph Nye at Harvard. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:20 am
- New EDPA case requiring unsuccessful plaintiff to pay as costs part of cost of complying with its ediscovery demands - Link.June 16, 2011: It Should Be An Interesting Couple Of Weeks - Analysis of new Supreme Court Smith v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
[People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
FIND #2 Nye Gade P.O. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 1:32 pm
The case, Stoneridge Investment v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:10 pm
Nye, 261 US 24 (1923), the Supreme Court wanted to avoid "stirring up litigation. [read post]
