Search for: "People v. Ortiz" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 7:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case asks whether you can sue the medical provider for charging more than 75 cents.The case is Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
 The People have the initial burden of going forward to show the “lack of any undue suggestiveness” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990]; People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 [1997]). [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am by Margo Schlanger
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Lomax v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:46 am by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts Massachusetts Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Benefits Can Require Examination by Physical Therapists, Not Just Medical Doctors – Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:43 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Having said the above, the next point of discussion with someone consulting with him would be to point out the case, Carlotta Ortiz and Mario Zepeda v. [read post]