Search for: "People v. Ortiz" Results 101 - 120 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
The Associated Press previews Ortiz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Video Software Dealers Association and Ortiz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:27 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in an odd qualified immunity case this morning, Ortiz v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the search of three residences in a Kansas City methamphetamine case in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:50 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" The Court explained that It is well settled that showup identifications are generally disfavored because they are inherently suggestive by nature, but they nevertheless are not "presumptively infirm" (People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541, 543; see People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533, 537). [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 12:30 am
 A6941A Ortiz (MS) -- Enacts the "child sexual abuse and exploitation prevention act"; repealer Same as S 2205-A BLURB : CP L. chld sxl abse & expltn pvtnLast Act: 01/29/10 amend and recommit to codes01/29/10 print number 6941aLast Action Date: 02/01/10(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
Armando Gonzalez and Jose Ortiz are driving in Pomona with a couple of fellow gang-bangers. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
Subscription Required BRONX COUNTY Criminal Practice Drugs, Money Found in Car's Magnetic Key Holder Suppressed; Detective Exceeded Scope of Intrusion People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:27 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Constitutional Law Free With Registration: Interpretation of Riot Statute Was Not So 'Novel' as to Deny 'Fair Notice' Ortiz v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
Ortiz, the court affirms the defendant’s conviction for felonious assault and attempted murder merge, the precise issue involved in State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We don't mind people saying we're full of it, we couldn't be litigators if we did, but that should be decided on the strength of our arguments, not on which side of the "v" we reside. [read post]