Search for: "People v. Ortiz (1990)"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The People have the initial burden of going forward to show the “lack of any undue suggestiveness” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990]; People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 [1997]). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:09 pm
([C]ompare People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz challenge the defendants’ use of images of their artwork, registered with the U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
.
A3747
Ortiz -- Directs the commissioner of correctional services to promulgate rules and regulations providing for inmate reimbursement of expenses of confinement in certain instancesSUMM : Add S601-d, Cor L Directs the commissioner of correctional services to promulgate rules and regulations providing for inmate reimbursement of expenses of confinement in certain instances. 01/29/07 referred to correctionLAW / CORRECTNSA3777
Townsend -- Provides that an inmate of a… [read post]
